The whole idea of amateur porn raises a host of issues about women's autonomy and subjectivity for me. All the feminist arguments about exploitation, victimization, hate speech, and objectification become more complicated within the context of amateur porn.
1. One can say that in amateur porn, women have choice and even control (though the notion of choice is always problematic and choice is always constrained by compulsivity). Women are producers of pornographic texts.
2. In amateur porn, women aren't working, so the Marxist analysis of women as exploited sexual labor falls flat.
3. I wish I knew who the audience and consumers of amateur porn were. Amateur porn certainly challenges Laura Mulvey's arguments about women having to cross gendered subject positions to identify with the subject (and I use that word on purpose) of pornography.
4. And a question: How do new technologies shape the "pleasure and danger" of amateur porn?
As Zabet Patterson writes (in "Going on line: Consuming pornography in the digital era," from Linda Williams' _Porn Studies_):
We will never understand internet pornography as long as we consider the networked personal computer as a mere tool through which we access the sexually explicit graphics, for in so doing, we miss the ways in which our sexual desires are being mediated through the pleasures of the technology itself, and the particular fantasies it has on offer.These are fascinating issues I'd love to think through more fully. In fact, I'd love to do a study of Redtube.com, but I really don't want to wade through hours of amateur porn to make the arguments. Maybe I really just want to read someone else's study.

4 comments:
Why is hegemony both disturbing and hot?
~S
I volunteer to wade through all that amateur porn and conduct a content analysis. Reckon we could get a grant for a joint project?
Post a Comment